<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introducing Sufjan Stevens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johndcorson.com/blog/2006/07/12/thats-soofyan-to-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johndcorson.com/blog/2006/07/12/thats-soofyan-to-you/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:53:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase Abner</title>
		<link>http://www.johndcorson.com/blog/2006/07/12/thats-soofyan-to-you/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase Abner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 20:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johndcorson.com/blog/2006/07/12/thats-soofyan-to-you/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no conspiracy.  I simply spend entirely too much time on iTunes and on various music websites.  And I read carefully.

I read the article that you quoted from.  I think Stephen Thomas Erlewine just wanted to be &quot;that guy&quot; who doesn&#039;t like Sufjan Stevens.  Like it would somehow boost his music scholar street cred if he could piece together a mildly-intelligible critique of Sufjan&#039;s work.  He completely misses the way Sufjan has mastered the craft of songwriting to a point where he can write things that hinge between the silly and the profound.  Seriously, what is &quot;adolescent&quot; about &quot;John Wayne Gacy, Jr.&quot;  Maybe if Sufjan went by three names he would be cooler.  Sufjan Thomas Stevens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no conspiracy.  I simply spend entirely too much time on iTunes and on various music websites.  And I read carefully.</p>
<p>I read the article that you quoted from.  I think Stephen Thomas Erlewine just wanted to be &#8220;that guy&#8221; who doesn&#8217;t like Sufjan Stevens.  Like it would somehow boost his music scholar street cred if he could piece together a mildly-intelligible critique of Sufjan&#8217;s work.  He completely misses the way Sufjan has mastered the craft of songwriting to a point where he can write things that hinge between the silly and the profound.  Seriously, what is &#8220;adolescent&#8221; about &#8220;John Wayne Gacy, Jr.&#8221;  Maybe if Sufjan went by three names he would be cooler.  Sufjan Thomas Stevens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

